2024 SCLR 3
Other citations:
Yet to be published in PLD/SCMR.
[Supreme Court of Pakistan]
Present: Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Musarrat Hilali, JJ
Election Commission of Pakistan through its Secretary, Islamabad—Petitioner
versus
Dawood Shah and others—Respondents
Civil Petition No. 4522 of 2023, decided on 2nd January, 2024.
(Against the judgment dated 27.12.2023 passed by Peshawar High Court, Peshawar, in W.P.No.6194-P/2023)
HEADNOTE
Constitution of Pakistan —
— Arts. 185 & 199 — Constitutional jurisdiction — Dismissal of writ petition while adjudicating on an interlocutory application — Scope — Supreme Court addressed a petition filed by the Election Commission of Pakistan against an ad-interim ex-parte order of the Peshawar High Court — The High Court had suspended the ECP’s notification changing the returning officer for a constituency on medical grounds and the officer’s own request — Court found that the change of returning officer was justifiable, as supported by a medical certificate and the officer’s application citing health reasons — Respondents, who challenged the change of returning officer in the High Court, failed to provide a satisfactory reason for their objection (to the change) — The ECP stated that the suspension of the order hindered the scrutiny of nomination papers as scheduled — The Supreme Court not only set aside the interim order but also dismissed the writ petition pending before the High Court and criticized the High Court’s ex-parte order for potentially jeopardizing the election programme. [Para. No. 4, 5 & 6]
Afnan Karim Kundi, Advocate Supreme Court, Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record along with Zafar Iqbal Hussain, Spl. Secretary, M. Arshad, DG Law and Falak Sher, Legal Consultant for the petitioner.
Syed Sikandar Hayat Shah, Advocate Supreme Court (via video link from Peshawar) for the respondents no. 1 & 2.
Date of hearing: 2nd January, 2024.
ORDER
Qazi Faez Isa, CJ:—The Election Commission of Pakistan (‘ECP’) has filed this petition against an ad-interim ex-parte order of the Peshawar High Court dated 27 December 2023, whereby a learned single Judge had suspended the notification dated 25 December 2023 of the ECP through which the returning officer of a constituency was changed. It is submitted that the returning officer was changed on medical ground and on his own request, and referred to the attached medical certificate and the application of the said returning officer requesting that in view of his ill health he cannot undertake the assigned responsibilities. Accordingly, it is submitted that for justifiable reason, the ECP had changed the returning officer.
2. The respondents No.1 and 2 have entered appearance through learned Syed Sikandar Hayat Shah. We enquired from learned counsel as to why the said respondents had filed the petition before the High Court assailing the change of the returning officer and how were they aggrieved with the change of the returning officer, but did not receive any satisfactory answer from him. He however stated that scrutiny of the said respondents’ nomination papers has not taken place.
3. Learned Mr. Afnan Karim Kundi representing the ECP states that it is on account of their own acts that the scrutiny of nomination papers, scheduled to take place on 28 December 2023, could not take place because the said respondents had the notification suspended on 27 December 2023 and there was no returning officer to scrutinize the nomination papers. He however submits that if the impugned order is set aside, the ECP shall ensure that the scrutiny of nomination papers of the said respondents and the other candidates, whose scrutiny of nomination papers in respect of the Provincial constituency (PK-91 Kohat-II) that could not take place on account of the ad-interim ex-parte order will be undertaken as per the following schedule:
PK-91 KOHAT-II
SL. NO. | EVENTS | NOTIFIED DATE | REVISED DATE |
4. | Last date for Scrutiny of nomination papers by the Returning Officer | 25.12.2023 to 30.12.2023 | 05.01.2024 |
5. | Last date for filing of appeals against decisions of the Retuning Officer rejecting/accepting the nomination papers. | 03.01.2024 | 09.01.2024 |
6. | Last date for deciding of appeals by the Appellate Tribunal | 10.01.2024 | 16.01.2024 |
7. | Publication of revised list of candidates | 11.01.2024 | 17.01.2024 |
8. | Last date for withdrawal of candidature and publication of revised list of candidates | 12.01.2024 | 18.01.2024 |
9. | Allotment of election symbols to contesting candidates | 13.0.2024 (sic) | 19.01.2024 |
4. We are satisfied that the ECP, for justifiable reasons, had issued the notification substituting the returning officer. It is also the responsibility of the ECP to conduct elections. Moreover, no allegation against the newly appointed returning officer was made. Therefore, it cannot be stated that the exercise of discretion by the ECP was in any manner illegal or unconstitutional. It is also of concern that an ad-interim ex-parte order was passed by the learned Judge of the High Court without issuance of notice to or hearing the ECP; which would adversely affect the election programme and jeopardise the elections to be held in the said constituency.
5. Under the circumstances, we set aside the impugned order dated 27 December 2023 by converting this petition into an appeal and allowing the same and by dismissing Writ Petition No.6194-P/2023 filed in the Peshawar High Court. However, since the stipulated date for the scrutiny of nomination papers of candidates could not be completed on account of the said ad-interim ex-parte order, we direct that the scrutiny of the nomination papers of candidates, including the said respondents, whose scrutiny of nomination papers has not taken place be undertaken as per the given fresh schedule reproduced above.
6. This petition is converted into an appeal and allowed in the said terms.
Appeal allowed