2026 CJ Review 13Ghulam Abbas vs. Telephone Industries of Pakistan and two others
--- Questions of jurisdiction go to the root of the matter; any order passed without lawful authority or coram non judice is void ab initio and cannot be sustained irrespective of the merits of the underlying claim.
2026 CJ Review 13Ghulam Abbas vs. Telephone Industries of Pakistan and two others
--- An order suffering from a patent lack of jurisdiction is a nullity in the eye of the law and cannot attain finality merely because an alternate remedy has been invoked or exhausted.
2026 CJ Review 13Ghulam Abbas vs. Telephone Industries of Pakistan and two others
--- Jurisdictional defect --- Scope --- An order declining to entertain a matter on limitation does not amount to an affirmation of the impugned order on merits, nor does it cure an inherent jurisdictional defect, if any, in the original proceedings.
2026 CJ Review 2Khalid Mehmood vs. Pakistan, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others
--- Art. 10-A --- Right to fair trial --- Jurisdiction --- Scope --- A court cannot issue any order, judgment, or exercise an authority in a matter unless it is legally competent to adjudicate upon it --- Jurisdiction is a foundational issue that must be determined at the very beginning of any proceeding and the court that is authorized to render a final judgment or order on the lis is the one vested with the competence to adjudicate it --- This is because the legitimacy and finality of any judgment depend on whether the bench delivering it had the lawful authority to do so --- Such jurisdictional certainty is essential not only for the validity of judicial decisions but also for safeguarding the right to a fair trial under Article 10-A and for ensuring due process.