— No illegal act or wrong entry can be legitimized with efflux of time howsoever long it might be. [2024 CLS 13 = 2024 CLC 106 = 2022 LHC 8152]

— No limitation would run in the matter of inheritance having recurring cause of action — Party having its right in the inherited property can claim the same at any time — Any transaction found to be result of misrepresentation cannot be protected on the sole score of limitation as it does not apply in the case of inheritance as barrier of limitation is no more a hurdle in the enforcement of rights of inheritance unless a party is shown to be guilty of gross negligence and abandonment of his / her rights — Entries in the revenue record afford fresh cause of action to the plaintiff and adverse entries if allowed to remain unchallenged do not extinguish right of a party against whom such entry had been made. [2024 CLS 13 = 2024 CLC 106 = 2022 LHC 8152]

— Where the order under review was not just void due to lack of jurisdiction but had been passed in ignorance of the law settled by the Supreme Court and the consent recorded was detrimental to the state exchequer, high court observed that it could, in its inherent jurisdiction, overlook and condone the delay to rectify the wrong. [2024 CLS 8 = 2024 CLC 71 = 2021 LHC 5343]

— No limitation runs in cases where the order is void. [2024 CLS 8 = 2024 CLC 71 = 2021 LHC 5343]

— If more than one appeals are arisen out of a common judgment and if one or more of those appeals are even barred by time, same could not be dismissed on account of limitation. [2024 CLS 1 = 2024 CLC 1 = 2023 LHC 3306]

— It is not an established legal principle that no limitation can be imposed against a wrong (mutation) entry. [2023 SCLR 67 = 2023 SCMR 2103 = 2023 SCP 318]